Connect with us
Barrett News Media Summit 2024

BNM Writers

Bruce Hooley Knew Journalism Was the Career for Him

A journalism professor told Hooley a good broadcaster needed to know how to write first. That’s when he fell into print. 

Avatar photo

Published

on

Bruce Hooley joined Salem Media of Ohio in October 2020, following a three-decade career in newspaper, radio and television. At the Cleveland Plain Dealer, Hooley covered Ohio State University for 18 years, while also serving as the PD’s national college football and basketball reporter. 

When he was 10 years old, like most boys, Hooley thought he wanted to be a professional athlete. At the point he realized that wasn’t going to happen he thought of being a play-by-play announcer, thought he might cover sports in some way.

“In high school, I played golf, basketball,” Hooley said. “I was a cross-country runner and our team was good, but I didn’t do anything beyond that.”

He didn’t go the play-by-play route, but he did pursue writing and journalism. 

“Looking back I’m sure I’d cringe at the first things I wrote,” Hooley said. “But I wanted to get into journalism before I earned my college degree. A small town offered me the opportunity to write sports on the weekend. As time went on I hope I got better.”

A journalism professor told Hooley a good broadcaster needed to know how to write first. That’s when he fell into print. 

“After a year at the first small paper, I was offered a job at a second small newspaper,” Hooley explained. “Three years later I was covering the Miami Dolphins for the now defunct Miami News from 1986-1987.” 

Hooley had some familiarity with Florida as he’d spent time visiting friends, he knew about the heat. He interviewed for the Miami News job while on vacation. 

“I knew what it’d be like down there in the late 80s, the whole Miami Vice vibe working,” Hooley said. 

Hooley offers some advice to a young reporter thinking about covering news or sports. 

“If you’re afraid of being around people acting mean, you’re never going to be any good as a reporter,” he said. 

“My first experience with a difficult interview was with Hall of Fame Miami Dolphins coach Don Shula,” Hooley explained. “He was a man who didn’t suffer fools. Coaches like Jimmy Johnson, Bobby Knight, like all the tough coaches, you had to hold your own with them. Shula was a tough guy, but a fair guy. You can’t be afraid to ask a tough question as long as it’s a fair question.” 

Hooley said it’s critical to be committed to your line of questioning. When Hooley was in Miami, the Dolphins had Dan Marino. They’d been to the Super Bowl. The Killer Bees were losing their effectiveness, the defense was injury-riddled. You can understand if Shula was a bit testy in those days. 

“Shula didn’t like to answer questions about obvious and negative things,” Hooley said. “He would give you a stern look when you asked a tough questions. He wanted to challenge you, try to deflect and get away from your question. I’d stay with my line of questioning and eventually he would answer.”

Hooley was grateful he had experienced reporters around him to draw from. Guys like Andy Cohen of the Fort Lauderdale Sun-Sentinel. Experienced reporters in Miami and West Palm Beach knew the game and asked solid questions. Hooley said he learned from those reporters.

“There are always good people in every medium, just as there are lazy reporters in every medium,” Hooley said. “I’ve always strived to be one of the good ones, but that doesn’t make you very popular at times. I never look to draw blood in a press conference. I always thought I was there to ask the questions the fans would ask if they could. You have to make coverage decisions, decide what you’re going to ask, even if it’s unpleasant.” 

When a team would lose to an unranked team regularly, Hooley said that’s a fair opportunity to ask a coach about that. It’s fair and responsible.

“I remember a coach on the night he got fired who shook my hand. He told me while we always didn’t get along, he respected what I had to do.”

It’s one thing to cover a team for a season through good times and bad, and it’s quite another to come in and take the lazy shots.

“I was always suspicious of some of the TV guys who would come to just one press conference a year,” Hooley said. “They’d mic themselves up when a team wasn’t doing well so they could record their question, and use those often angry answers over and over. You wouldn’t see that reporter for the rest of the year. That’s not who I am, not who I’ve ever been. I’ll ask questions other reporters don’t ask.”

On The Bruce Hooley Show – Columbus – 98.9 FM The Answer, Hooley says it’s a news and talk format. He enjoys the forum after spending so much time in sports. “There were times working in sports where I wondered how much my work meant in the grand scheme of things. I embrace the opportunity to do news and talk. I think I can use my analytical skills that may awaken some people to the dangers that are out there.”

Hooley has covered 19 NCAA Final Fours, the 1988 Winter Olympics, the World Series, the Super Bowl and numerous professional golf majors. He’s worked with former NFL player Chris Spielman in several formats, including an iHeart sports startup that folded in 2019. 

He’s concerned about the direction of the country. “In our current direction, I see the vilification of what America is,” Hooley said. “While we’ve never been a perfect country, we’re an awesome country that puts their dirty laundry out there. I want my daughters to live in a country where they can state their opinion and not be canceled for it. I want them to have the childhood I had. I’m seeing too many warning signs that won’t be the case.”

Hooley explained when he was growing up we didn’t have politicians lying so blatantly. 

“I have a problem with presidents lying,” he said. “Trump said he’s going to build a wall and Mexico was going to pay for it. He didn’t build it and Mexico is not paying for what they have built. I don’t like it when Joe Biden says the pandemic is over so he’ll cancel student debt. I get tired of the cavalier nature of lying from our leaders. These are people we need to look up to in times of trouble. We need to be able to trust them.”

Hooley doesn’t think we should say our ability to trust is gone permanently. 

“We get to vote for change and we can insist on honesty and trust,” he said. “Let’s do that.  I am sick and tired of hearing how our Democracy is under threat. In the first place, we’re a constitutional federal republic. So right off the bat people don’t know what they’re talking about.” 

Hooley explained we get the leaders we give ourselves. Like the old saying about insanity; doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result.

“We’ve got a generation of new leaders I have hope for. I believe in the American Dream. I’ve always wondered what I had in me. How far could I be tested? Just like the soldiers on the boats coming ashore at Normandy. Could I have withstood that fear and horror? The truth is not always pleasant. I will have vehement arguments when necessary.”

Hooley said our Founding Fathers were very wise. There’s a reason they made freedom of speech our First Amendment. 

“I’m interested in conversation with the most ardent opponent of my position,” he said. “I’m not going to defend anyone who is interested in shutting down speech. Words are not violence. Violence is violence.”

Hooley has questions about a lot of things. 

“We’re dealing with a lot of accusations about fake elections.”

He’s not going to swallow the concept of hook-line-sinker, but he does question some elements of the argument. “Things like the supposed flooding that slowed ballot counting in Atlanta. I’m looking for the truth, not just answers.”

The Pillow Man hasn’t escaped Hooley’s critical eye. If you’re wearing a Christian symbol around your neck, try to honor that. 

“While I understand Mike Lindell’s passion for what he believes in, he’s compromised my ability to trust him with all his claims of evidence of election fraud by producing none. My sense of Mike Lindell is he seems like a nice guy. Does a lot to help others, people with addictions. Unless he shows me proof, I have to discount what he says on an election fraud issue.”

Hooley said some of our long-trusted news sources have gone Topsy-Turvey. 

He said after John Fetterman recited talking points during his recent debate, Hooley said Time Magazine did nothing but repeat every single talking point. 

“This isn’t the way things used to be,” Hooley explained. “Sometimes I’m embarrassed to be a journalist. I’m embarrassed by what I see on MSNBC. I’m embarrassed by the programming on Fox after 8 pm.” 

Hooley cited writer Bernard Goldberg who wrote, “We’ve gotten to a point in our country where we’re ‘rooting for laundry.’” 

I did some research on Goldberg’s quote and found it very germane to the fabric of our national conversation. Goldberg speaks to the zero-sum game of so many people in our country. For those reasons, I’ve culled a few of Goldberg’s thoughts.

“It’s not beliefs we’re hanging on to,” Goldberg writes.“It’s identity that we cling to; what matters most now is what team we play for.No one is watching the other side to learn something they hadn’t already thought of. Sports fans cheer for the star player who wears their team’s uniform until he decides to put on another uniform and play for a rival that’s offering him more money. Then they boo the very same guy. As Jerry Seinfeld said, fans are just cheering for clothes; they’re rooting for laundry.”

“I’ll get in trouble for saying this on my own show,” Hooley said, “but I think Republicans would be nuts to nominate Trump again for president. You have Desantis and a number of other people to pick from. There are a lot of people sitting on a big bench. I can name eight more right now. We need someone who awakens people and enlivens them.” 

Hooley said he’s astounded he’s never heard a Republican talk about the demonization of MAGA. Hooley said it’s about making America great again, not making Trump great. 

“Some are of the opinion America was never great. I don’t agree with that. It’s ridiculous that people would oppose the idea of America being great. Our only hope in the world is for America being great. I spoke at one of Trump’s rallies. It was a great experience, but I didn’t get up and extol his virtues.”

In 2012, Hooley co-wrote That’s Why I’m Here: The Chris and Stefanie Spielman Story with a friend and former NFL player Chris Spielman. 

“Chris and I worked together in radio as a team on 97.1 The Fan, before it was 1460 AM in Columbus,” Hooley said. “I went there from The Plain Dealer in the summer of 2005. I hosted afternoons for a while. We were colleagues who became close friends. When his wife Stefanie had her final relapse with cancer we became even closer. I asked him what I could do. At various times we’d talked about writing a book. He told me that’s what I could do to help, and wanted to start the very next day.”

Hooley said during the writing process they’d meet for an hour before their show and talk about what they wanted to write about. 

“I think it was very cathartic for him and it ultimately kept a very accurate record,” Hooley said. Spielman’s two daughters were too young to understand the breadth of everything their parents were going on at the time. Now they’re both out of high school.

“I don’t know whether they’ve read it,” Hooley said. “But at least there is an accurate record of all they went through. If they read it I hope they took some solace from the book. We chronicled the way they waged their battle. It was impactful. They were such courageous examples.” 

Subscribe To The BNM Rundown

The Top 8 News Media Stories of the Day, sent directly to your inbox every afternoon!

Invalid email address
We promise not to spam you. You can unsubscribe at any time.
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

BNM Writers

It’s Time for News Radio to Clean Its Clock

With radio, the top of the hour always begins with a self-aggrandizing, overly-produced introduction to a program I may have been listening to for half an hour already.

Avatar photo

Published

on

A photo of clocks

News radio is an interruptive format that swiftly moves listeners from one informative topic to
the next but over the years we’ve gotten bogged down with an insufferable amount of clutter: too many commercials, endless promos and teases, and pointless production pieces. All of it
interrupts the flow and cuts into the interesting information you promise to provide.

Let’s clean the clutter, starting with the anachronistic basis for it all: your hourly format clock.

I’ve never understood why radio stations root themselves to the clock. The show starts at the top of the hour and you bury your boring features at the end. Why? Why should the top of the hour be considered the beginning of anything? It’s not how people live their lives. Radio isn’t like TV where shows start at specific times. Hell, TV isn’t that way anymore.

But with news radio, the top of the hour always begins with a self-aggrandizing, overly-produced introduction to a program I may have been listening to for half an hour already. This is especially true with morning shows, where simple logic would suggest that people trying to get to work by the top of an hour begin listening at various times before then.

Who even owns a clock radio anymore?

The 21st century is nonstop. There is no daily news cycle, no beginning or end to anything but
news radio programmers still think of time in divisions of hours, minutes, and seconds. We still draw empty circles depicting analog clocks to plot hourly radio formats.

On news and talk stations, the top of the hour almost always begins with the hourly network
report. It’s the biggest of big-time radio, steeped in tradition, professionally detached, global. In other words, it sounds nothing like your radio station in your unique market and it contains the least interesting content you have to offer.

We cling to the networks at the top of the hour for their prestige, because that’s just how we’ve always done it. Any national or international stories of real interest to Americans, the latest Trump-Biden court decisions, for example, will be well covered in talk shows and you’ll probably want to drop it into your local programming, too. How about a one-minute segment twice an hour, 60 seconds of just the big national and world stuff, in 10-15-second boil-in-the-bag headline segments? I’m just spitballing here. You’re the programmer.

In my heretical news radio mind, the networks do great journalism but they still sound flat,
stuffy, and old-fashioned. They don’t sound like anything else on my station. I’ll dump the top-of-the-hour five minutes and cherry-pick the network sound bites. We’ll deliver them ourselves.

While I’m carving up your format and trying to get you thinking outside the box, do you need
traffic reports every ten minutes? Or, at all? Heresy, I know. Catch your breath and read on.

When we had real-time airborne local reporters telling us what they were looking at it had a gee-whiz factor and the information mattered because it was live, local first-hand reporting. I could imagine the scene as it was being described. Now we have reporters in booths looking at
computer feeds and doing shotgun-style traffic reports for multiple cities. Words without
pictures.

I knew an L.A.-based traffic reporter who did reports for Salt Lake City though she had never even been there. These so-called “real-time traffic” reports are nearly always recorded and delayed for playback. Does this practice serve any purpose at all except to deceive listeners?

Not incidentally, traffic reports are a prime target for AI exploitation. How difficult can it be to
attach state and local transportation agency traffic data to AI voice-to-speech generators? For all I know this is already being done. You can argue it’s cost-efficient but as a longtime morning news host/anchor/personality, I despise it. One of the greatest assets to any morning news team is the interaction between news and traffic people.

When Amy Chodroff and I started working together at KLIF a dozen years ago we had that human contact with remarkable radio veteran Bill Jackson doing traffic from an adjoining studio. Bill wasn’t just a voice, he was a talented news radio veteran and a valued part of our show. He was so good the company, Cumulus, put two more stations on his plate, ripping a valued team member away from us.

As hosts, Amy and I had to assume Bill wasn’t able to listen to the show anymore because he
was too busy gathering and preparing his reports for the other stations. Then he was shipped out of the building to do his work from home which made his insights and witty exchanges
impossible. We couldn’t talk to each other off the air. We couldn’t exchange glances, smiles, and hand signals or bump into each other in the hall. Our show suffered and our audience became a bit more detached.

Bill Jackson, real name Dale Kuckelburg, was also significantly detached from his career.

But I digress. The biggest problem with traffic reports is the shotgun approach I mentioned,
telling everybody in our listening area driving to their unique destinations how traffic is snarled thirty miles away. Good god, we have apps in our cars that do a much better job in real time.

How about the weather? What the hell, we’re swinging the ax here. Let’s be realistic.

There isn’t a day in my life that I don’t wake up with a fair idea of what weather I should expect. I don’t need someone on the radio telling me to carry an umbrella. If it’s iffy the immediate and highly local details are now available at the touch of an app. When the weather becomes of critical and life-threatening importance it’s a major news story and that’s when local radio news shines, making it the center of our continuous attention, not just a regular feature at scheduled times.

It’s your radio station, do what you think is best. I’m only suggesting that you might want to
reevaluate all the things we’ve all taken for granted for far too long.

News radio has always been an interruptive format. We promise listeners “the news you need” in the time it takes them to drive to work. They understand that they’ll receive useful and
interesting content in exchange for frequent subject switching and sponsorships. The great news stations know how to capitalize on that agreement but too many have sold their souls to
commercial clutter that chokes a news team’s ability to serve the promised meal.

As if 22 minutes of inane and repetitive commercials per hour aren’t bad enough programmers, struggling to do their work in a hurricane of increasing spotloads, add to the clutter with recorded promos that simply beseech listeners to keep listening while offering nothing of substance. Meanwhile, the same programmers tell talent to tease, tease, tease the subjects they’ll talk about six, twelve, and twenty minutes from now.

I know the business reality. Radio — especially news radio — is struggling to meet the profit insistence of corporate boards and the overhead needs of staying afloat locally. But at some point, we must answer the question, who do we have to serve first, our clients or our audience?

Station managers and their corporate masters have to stop issuing profit mandates without
offering programmers the opportunity to do their jobs, to provide more valuable content while
limiting commercial minutes, sponsorship rhetoric, and eliminating distracting bells and
whistles.

Clean your clock. Stop filling empty circles with stuff that made sense 50 years ago but is merely clutter today.

The only way to think outside the box is to get rid of the box.

Subscribe To The BNM Rundown

The Top 8 News Media Stories of the Day, sent directly to your inbox every afternoon!

Invalid email address
We promise not to spam you. You can unsubscribe at any time.
Continue Reading

BNM Writers

AM 680 WCBM Leapt Into Action As the Francis Scott Key Bridge Collapsed

Our employees live and work here and know what’s important to our listeners.

Published

on

As Americans woke up to a cargo ship hitting Baltimore’s Francis Scott Key Bridge Tuesday morning, the crew at AM 680 WCBM was already hard at work gathering the facts.

Just before 1:30 AM, a cargo ship lost power exiting the Baltimore harbor, striking a support beam that toppled the 47-year-old structure. In the wreckage, six people working on the bridge died, while drivers were rescued from the rubble in the chilly waters of the Curtis Bay.

The AM news/talk station — which celebrated its 100th anniversary Thursday — went wall-to-wall breaking coverage, something most outlets now avoid because of budget concerns. 680 WCBM morning host and Program Director Sean Casey told BNM in an email exchange how his crews handled the breaking news.


BNM: When did you guys hit the air with breaking news coverage?

Sean Casey: We first broke in with updates at 3:30 AM, approximately two hours after the bridge collapsed. Breaking news updates continued every half hour until 6 AM.”

BNM: How did you coordinate coverage in those moments?

SC: Full wall-to-wall coverage started at 6 AM and included full newscasts as well as interviews with state and local law enforcement agencies, eyewitness call-ins, and our national news partners. Our producer made call-outs and our news department shifted to full-blown local coverage.

BNM: How much experience did you have in putting together coverage of an event like that on the fly?

SC: Having been on the air during 9/11, I used the same formula that listeners want to know: Who, What, When, and Where? The why will come later.

BNM: How does your coverage show the importance of both local radio and AM radio?

SC: In times of breaking news events that impact our listeners, local AM radio stations are more in tune with the local listening audience. Our employees live and work here and know what’s important to our listeners. We also know the local players and officials and can get immediate reaction.

The talk component of our news/talk format offers listeners a chance to vent, share, and communicate with each other in good and bad times. This is why AM radio is still relevant. In some emergencies you can lose your cell service or have too weak of a signal, AM radio remains viable for in-car listening and at home with battery backup.

The AM 680 WCBM morning host and Program Director concluded his thoughts by noting the importance of a team effort, not only in coverage of breaking news events but also in operating a successful station and business as a whole.

“One of the biggest concerns we have is budgetary. More and more AM stations are abandoning the format because of its expense. Very few can afford a live and local news staff and show hosts,” Casey told Barrett News Media.

“Now more than ever, it’s vital that there be synergy between ownership, sales, and programming to maximize ratings and revenue so that we can continue to deliver vital information to listeners in our market.”

Subscribe To The BNM Rundown

The Top 8 News Media Stories of the Day, sent directly to your inbox every afternoon!

Invalid email address
We promise not to spam you. You can unsubscribe at any time.
Continue Reading

BNM Writers

News is the Only Thing Missing From Election Coverage

Coverage of the election is, as we’ve discussed, still very horse-race-centric, and there’s been, of course, coverage of the various Trump court cases, but where is the coverage of exactly what the candidates plan to do if elected?

Published

on

A photo featuring I voted stickers

The first thought I had when I heard NBC had hired Ronna McDaniel as a commentator for $300,000 a year was to wonder how many actual journalists they could have hired for that money. Then, I recalled that NBC had laid off dozens of news staffers just a few months ago. Then, I remembered that I had just recently written a column decrying news organizations throwing pretty much anybody on the air as a “pundit” and this….

This was worse. It’s one thing to grab some rando who happened to be a minor functionary for the Executive Branch. It’s another to hire someone whose job was to promote election denialism and pretend that her opinion is something valuable for viewers. And, yes, it’s just as ridiculous when news organizations hire former presidential press secretaries (that’s you, Jen Psaki and Sean Spicer), their very jobs were to spin everything in their bosses’ favor and now you’re going to pay them big salaries for, um, what? Because they “have a name” or you’re afraid someone else will snap them up? Why them?

The McDaniel deal lasted five days, one completely unilluminating interview, and one unexpected Chuck Todd spine-growing outburst, so it’ll all blow over soon enough. The problem is, though, the part about having fired several news staffers, and what it means in an election year on both the national and local levels. If you have the money to hire an alleged pundit – any alleged pundit – you have the money to hire reporters, and I don’t mean anchors or opinion show hosts.

Coverage of the election is, as we’ve discussed, still very horse-race-centric, and there’s been, of course, coverage of the various Trump court cases, but where is the coverage of exactly what the candidates plan to do if elected? Who’s probing Project 2025 and why isn’t it front-page, first-segment news? Who’s pressing the Biden administration on Gaza? Is anyone reporting on the candidates’ record on climate change?

Beyond prescription drug prices, is anyone digging into the broken healthcare system and demanding answers from the candidates about what they’ll do to fix it (and not letting Trump get away with “I’ll have a better plan, a beautiful plan” without a single specific detail, like they did in 2016)? Why didn’t anyone focus on, for example, the GOP candidate for governor of North Carolina and his incendiary past comments well before the primary?

Pundits are not going to do the legwork on the issues; they’ll just talk about swing states while John King and Steve Kornacki point at their touchscreen maps. We need reporting on the things that matter (and can affect that horse race, even if most people have made up their minds). It shouldn’t just be Pro Publica and scattered independent journalists doing the dirty work.

Honestly, I don’t want to hear the complaints about the quality of the candidates or how this is a rerun or any of that. (We’ll leave that to The New York Times.) We are a horribly underinformed electorate and we got the horse race we deserve. It might just be idealists like me who think that, just maybe, the news media can play a role in educating the public and bursting the bubbles and echo chambers. This country has survived and prospered for a few centuries with the press shining a light on injustice and corruption.

Now, when we need that most, they’re more concerned with what they think will bring them ratings and money (although someone will have to explain to me who thought having Ronna McDaniel as a paid commentator would draw a single viewer to NBC).

Here’s a thought: Don’t lay off reporters, especially in an election year.  Assign them to dig deep on issues that matter to the voters.

Let the pundits talk about that.

Subscribe To The BNM Rundown

The Top 8 News Media Stories of the Day, sent directly to your inbox every afternoon!

Invalid email address
We promise not to spam you. You can unsubscribe at any time.
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Advertisement
Advertisement

Upcoming Events

BNM Writers

Copyright © 2024 Barrett Media.